Open
Conversation
ykws
changed the title
Member
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for maintaining this repository and for continuing the work based on
https://github.com/kishikawakatsumi/xcresulttool.
When we first tried the original repository, the workflow was failing at that time, and it was not clear to us whether it was still being actively maintained.
After trying this fork, everything worked as expected, so we decided to use this version instead.
However, the README still pointed to the original repository and its workflow status, which may make the transition less smooth for users in a similar situation.
To help make that transition smoother, I updated the README and related references.
Also, since the sample test result links may become unavailable over time, I replaced them with a link to the results list instead.
Could you please review these changes and let me know if I have misunderstood anything?
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.